Monday, November 30, 2009
Awkward...
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Articles
- Despite the many violations of the novel's shape and substance, Coppola manages to pay homage to Conrad's work in unexpected ways.
- There is a "creative imitation of the Conradian frame" in the form of a disembodied voice at the beginning and end of the film.
- In contrast to the book, the film portrays Kurtz as a solid, dedicated man while Captain Willard(Marlow) is more fragmented and corrupt. Neither major character in the film can be seen as a good example of Conradian ethics in the Heart of Darkness.
- Coppola uses 4 minor characters--Chief, Chef, Lance, and Kilgore--with largely un-Conradian names to depict the conflict of "good craftsman and hollow man" as it is in the Heart of Darkness between the two main characters.
- Chef and Chief give the perfect combination to depict Marlow's ethical craftmanship of discipline mixed with imaginative artistry.
- Though Lance and Kilgor are outward opposites, they are equally as hollow and empty on the inside.
- The main idea of The Heart of Darkness and the ethical issues within have been reused and reiterated through popular culture over the last hundred years.
- Apocalypse Now obviously uses the book to convey the same message about US involvement in Vietnam that Conrad was about imperialism in Africa. The popularity of the movie actually boosted the meaning and popularity of the book, and the depth of Conrad's words made a much more meaningful movie.
- The television show the Simpsons even has an episode named "The Bart of Darkness" and another that references the novel The Lord of the Flies, which in fact owes part of its influence to... yupp you guessed it, the Heart of Darkness.
- The influence present in the television show Star Trek is much more subtle than that in the Simpsons, but it is also more common. Throughout the series a main topic, just as in Heart of Darkness, is the question of what it means to be human. Star Trek uses aliens to discuss the moral issues and dilemmas present in the novel, and bits and pieces of the plots even correspond with the novel.
- Long story short, Conrad's Heart of Darkness has not only influenced much of out pop culture, it has become a "part of our heritage".
Thursday, November 12, 2009
Not So Different After All
Thursday, October 29, 2009
More Fun This Way
Faulkner: Technique of "The Sound and the Fury"
- Lawrence Edward Bowling
- The Kenyon Review, Vol. 10, No. 4 (Autumn, 1948), pp. 552-566
- Published by: Kenyon College
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Inner Dialogue?
Monday, October 5, 2009
No Redemption in Sight
John Cheever’s The Five-Forty-Eight is a chilling story that shows the unwillingness of man to change despite imminent danger and despite irreversible damage done to others. The main character, Blake, has spent years using and abusing the people around him with no real regard for their feelings. Inevitably, he finds himself in a position to change his ways and to apologize for at least one of the terrible things he has done, but fails to see the error of his conduct. When faced with someone he has hurt, Blake only thinks of himself, and when faced with death, he only thinks of the things he will miss.
Blake finds no harm in the way he treated Ms. Dent, so when she confronts him he makes no effort to redress or rectify what has happened. In fact, Blake is so unmoved by his actions that he manages to kick Ms. Dent while she is down when he ignores her at his office. It is clear that this is not the first time Blake has done something like this. He had encounters similar to this with “many women…picked for their lack of self-esteem” and had never cared for any of them.(505) When Blake does finally see Ms. Dent after their night in her apartment, she begins to weep as she had before. Once again, Blake notices her weeping, but does nothing. He does not even attempt to show signs of sympathy for her situation or regret for what he has done to her. The regret he does feel, however, is for not realizing she was crazy. At no point does the effect of his actions run through his head, instead his thoughts consist only of how he could have avoided seeing her on that day or avoided being with her before. To Blake, his error came not in his selfish and demeaning actions towards Ms. Dent or anyone else in his life, but instead in his lack of discernment in choosing the insane assistant as his vice.
Blake may well have been able to escape his moving prison while on the train with Ms. Dent had he not severed ties with all the people he knew, yet he still never repents or changes in any way. Both Mr. Watkins and Mrs. Compton were in a position to help Blake in his predicament, but because of the way he treats his wife and because of his arrogance when dealing with Mr. Watkins, he is left to his own seemingly imminent demise. Even when Blake is standing directly next to them, “neither of them spoke to him,” or when he is in the rain “none of them offered to give him a ride.”(511) Finally, after years of treating his wife irrationally, years of false egotism, and years of treating women he had relations with rudely, Blake is forced to face all of his mistakes at once. Yet, he does not know that is what has happened. When he begins to weep, it is not for regret of his actions, but for fear of death itself.
Anais Nin once said, “people living deeply have no fear of death” but Blake is not living deeply, a fact that he himself fails to realize. His whole life is on the surface, as shallow as his taste in women. His evaluations of people are short and judgmental and he a controlling user, which is why Ms. Dent’s actions fail to change Blake. Life went on before his episode with her, and it will either go on the same way after the episode, or it won’t at all. When all is said and done, Blake “picked up his hat from the ground where it had fallen and walked home”(512) showing that nothing had changed. It was just a weird day for Blake but now that it was over he could begin his walk home as he did every day before.
Sunday, October 4, 2009
1/2 Blog
Sunday, September 27, 2009
Rebirth or Final Destination?
Monday, September 21, 2009
A Bit Much
Sunday, September 13, 2009
Over-Vilified and Under-Appreciated
It is easy to vilify Daisy in the short story Teenage Wasteland but I think she is far better of a person and a mother than she is given credit for. In class, we successfully tore Daisy apart for fifty minutes; she’s too insecure, she’s too lenient; she’s too much of a friend, etc. Yes, she was pretty unsuccessful in most of her attempts at helping and understanding Donny, but at least she tries. Can we really say the same for the other men and women in Donny’s life? A father who barely appears in the story at all, let alone Donny’s life, a tutor who is just as much of a teenager as Donny is, and a set of teachers who are not much help but instead enjoy scolding Daisy for her mistakes, it is no wonder Donny turns out the way he does when so few people around him truly care about his well-being.
Donny’s principal and teachers are more than happy to point out the issues Donny is having and give suggestions to Daisy on how to handle it, yet there is no mention in the story of any of them giving her actual help. Daisy’s parenting is even blamed and questioned for his issue with alcohol at school. The fact that he was able to get drunk during school hours is not mentioned at all, just the issues he is having with his mother. The issues started at home, but there is still definitely ways for the school to keep him from drinking during school hours. I know I would never be able to at PCDS, there are too many rules in place and enforced for me to even really have the chance.
Donny’s father, Matt, rarely shows up in the story, and when he does he really only interacts with Daisy. There is little to no interaction between father and son in the story, giving Donny a large void for a father figure. His mother can only do so much in the fathering department, and with really no support from her husband to fall back on she is left all alone to parent the troublesome youth. She does what she can at home; she sets restrictions on phone calls and television as well as going so far as to watch him do his homework. This is not to say Daisy’s actions are perfect because she does not really bother to help Donny with his homework, she just watches him and only after it is suggested to her, and she completely neglects the needs of her other child. She does, however, make an attempt. She is not the most prepared or suitable mother but she definitely cares for Donny and tries her hardest, which cannot be said as easily for his father.
When Daisy does realize she is incapable of handling Donny on her own, the principal suggests she speak to Cal, a local tutor/counselor. It takes a lot of courage for a mother to admit she is not able of dealing with her children, let alone for her to ask someone to help out or take over. What Daisy did not realize, however, was that she was asking for help and entrusting her kid with someone as irresponsible as Donny. Daisy follows Cal’s lead thinking he knew better and could help; she even disregards teachers and shows misguided faith in Cal’s ability to aid her in her struggle. Cal’s house can best be described using the story’s title, a teenage wasteland. In class we spoke of how much Daisy wanted Donny to like her and insecure she was, but completely neglected the obvious fact that Cal is a Peter Pan- like figure that simply refused to grow up. He is able to justify to the parents and Daisy pretty much whatever the kids and Donny want to do just so they will like him. With incompetent help and misguided trust, Daisy is left as an unqualified mother trying to do right by her children and failing all along the way.